Sheikh Hasina needs to do more than ask, 'What kind of Muslims are these people?': Javed Anand
http://scroll.in/article/
TERROR ATTACK
Sheikh Hasina needs to do more than ask, 'What kind of Muslims are
these people?'
The Bangladesh leader needs to ask what kind of prime minister she is herself.
6 hours ago
Javed Anand, Sabrang
The heinous massacre of innocent men and women peacefully eating their
dinner at an up-market cafe in Dhaka this weekend has at last woken up
Sheikh Hasina Wajed to the continuing reign of terror – in Allah’s
name – in the country of which she has been prime minister (for the
second time) since 2009. Or so we hope.
Eyewitness survivors have said the killers stormed the popular Holey
Artisan Bakery in Dhaka’s posh Gulshan area on Friday evening shouting
“Allah-o-Akbar”.
“What kind of Muslims are these people? They don’t have any religion…
terrorism is their religion,” the prime minister is reported to have
stated while announcing the end of the siege which claimed 20 lives.
Begum Hasina would do better to ask herself the question that millions
of Bangladeshi citizens have been asking in their own manner for many
months now: What kind of Prime Minister are you, Begum Hasina? What
kind of Islam do you profess and what does it demand of you?
For the past year and a half, her government and police have been mute
witnesses as terrorists have picked their targets at will, one at a
time, killing Hindu priests, Shias, Ahmeddiyas, Sufis, secular
activists, atheists, bloggers, writers and professors, to name a few.
One of the killings was of a young student named Nazimuddin Samad. His
crime? Organising campaigns for secularism on Facebook.
Rising extremism
In an article published on Sabrang India less than two months ago,
Bangladesh’s feminist activist Khushi Kabir had pointed to her
country’s dangerous drift towards extremist Islam. “The message that
there is only one form, a form alien to this land, of belief and
practice, that of the Wahabi/Salafis who are not part of the four
Mazhabs of the Islamic Sunni belief is now being pushed with full
force as the current agenda," she said. "Many killed in brutal manner
have been believers, Pirs, Shias, Ahmedias, followers of the Sufi
tradition, priests from other religions, writers who were not
necessarily atheists”.
Kabir had lamented the Hasina government’s myopia over the dark clouds
gathering over Bangladesh and the state’s callous naming of the
victims as the accused: “Those feeling outraged at this [ongoing]
barbarism are asked that one should be careful not to hurt the
sentiment of the believers," she said. "Whose sentiment are we talking
about? Which believers? The misogynists, communalists who preach and
breed obscurantism, a group financially strong, having the backing of
the powers that be, misrepresenting and misquoting for their own
vested interests?”
“1971 has taught us that killing cannot stop freedom," she concluded.
"It did not then, it will not now”.
Her brave words, sadly, have not stopped the Islamists from their
murderous misdeeds.
Social activists like Kabir are not the only ones concerned over the
cancerous growth of extremism in the country’s body polity. Dhaka
Tribune reported on June 6 that over 1,00,000 ulema from Bangladesh
had issued a joint fatwa against terrorism.
Tracing the growth
The Islamic State, which has claimed “credit” for the latest mass
murder at Holey Artisan Bakery has also boasted of targeting others in
recent months. It and the Al Qaeda are currently engaged in a fierce
competition across our sub-continent aiming to outdo each other in
spreading their terror tentacles. That’s now. But the malignant growth
of Islamist extremism in Bangladesh can be easily traced back to the
Jamaat-e-Islami and its militant student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir.
The official website of the Jamaat-e-Islami continues to protest its
innocence, claiming that “Islamists are the most principled, pious,
god-fearing and kind people on the earth”. Facts on the ground tell a
different tale.
In March 2013, Amnesty International issued a press statement on the
countrywide attack on Hindus in which more than 40 temples were
vanadlised and scores of shops and homes were burnt down. Survivors
told Amnesty International that the attackers were participants in
rallies organised by the opposition Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami and
its student group Chhatra Shibir.
In April the same month, an entire galaxy of maulanas affiliated to
the Imam Ulema Somonnoy Oikyo Parishad, Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat
(Bangladesh) and other religious bodies in Bangladesh publicly
denounced the Jamaat-Shibir for their link with terrorist Islamist
organisations. “People who believe in Wahabism and Moududism (Maulana
Abul Ala Maududi was the founder of the Jamaat-e-Islami) are enemies
of Islam as they misinterpret Quran and Sunnah”, the Ahle Sunnat
(Bangladesh) secretary general Syed Muhammad Masiuddoula had thundered
at a Sunni Ulema-Mashayekh Conference on March 17.
In December 2013, the well-known human rights organisation Ain O
Salish Kendra documented 276 major incidents of attack by the
Jamaat-Shibir extremists during the year in which a total of 492
people including 15 police members were killed and around 2,200 others
were injured.
Close links
The demands of the terrorists in the latest carnage included the
release of Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh activists who were
sentenced to a 10-year jail term in January this year for their role
in a string of bomb attacks in the country in 2005. The
Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, which is now a local IS affiliate, is committed
to converting Bangladesh into an Islamic state through armed struggle.
On August 17, 2005, it had detonated some 500 bombs simultaneously
across 300 locations in 50 Bangladeshi cities.
While the origin of the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh in the late
1990s is shrouded in some mystery, the Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh has
been accused of patronising the former while it was part of the
coalition government headed by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. In
November 2005, a Bangladesh Nationalist MP, Abu Hena alleged that the
Jamaat-e-Islami was directly involved in the emergence of the
Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh. He even named two Jamaat-e-Islami
ministers in the Bangladesh Nationalist Party-led coalition who he
claimed “are doing everything for the militants”.
Hena’s expulsion from the party did not stop Bangladesh Nationalist
Party's former minister Oli Ahmed and party whip Ashraf Hossain from
speaking out and implicating the Jamaat-e-Islami in the rise of
extremism in the country.
Recall the vibrant Shahbag movement of 2013 (many at the time drew
parallels to the Arab Uprising) which started as a vehement rejection
of the International Crime Tribunal’s verdict to condemn Abdul Quader
Mollah, assistant general secretary of Jamaat-e-Islami, to life in
prison. Protesters wanted Mollah, who was convicted for killing
hundreds of people and raping a young girl, to be put to death. But
the movement soon took the form of a mass civil society awakening
which demanded an end to all religion-based politics.
Hasina, prime minister of Bangladesh since 2009, has been leader since
1981 of the Awami Party which spearheaded the country’s 1971 breakaway
from Pakistan, rejected the two-nations theory and espoused the ideal
of a secular nation and state.
Even in this dark moment it should be clear that there are millions of
Bangladeshis – from students, professors and activists to a wide
spectrum of maulanas wedded to a tolerant Islam – who are staunchly
opposed to the Wahhabis/Salafi and the Maududian “enemies of Islam”
determined to push the country towards a totalitarian Islamic state.
In 2013, the Supreme Court declared the Jamaat-e-Islami as “illegal”
and barred the party from contesting polls. In the past it had never
managed more than 4 per cent of the votes in any election in
Bangladesh.
So, to return to where this article began, before the terrorists claim
their next victim(s), Hasina would do well to ask herself: What kind
of a Prime Minister am I? What does my Islam demand of me?
This article first appeared on Sabrang India.
http://scroll.in/article/
TERROR ATTACK
Sheikh Hasina needs to do more than ask, 'What kind of Muslims are
these people?'
The Bangladesh leader needs to ask what kind of prime minister she is herself.
6 hours ago
Javed Anand, Sabrang
The heinous massacre of innocent men and women peacefully eating their
dinner at an up-market cafe in Dhaka this weekend has at last woken up
Sheikh Hasina Wajed to the continuing reign of terror – in Allah’s
name – in the country of which she has been prime minister (for the
second time) since 2009. Or so we hope.
Eyewitness survivors have said the killers stormed the popular Holey
Artisan Bakery in Dhaka’s posh Gulshan area on Friday evening shouting
“Allah-o-Akbar”.
“What kind of Muslims are these people? They don’t have any religion…
terrorism is their religion,” the prime minister is reported to have
stated while announcing the end of the siege which claimed 20 lives.
Begum Hasina would do better to ask herself the question that millions
of Bangladeshi citizens have been asking in their own manner for many
months now: What kind of Prime Minister are you, Begum Hasina? What
kind of Islam do you profess and what does it demand of you?
For the past year and a half, her government and police have been mute
witnesses as terrorists have picked their targets at will, one at a
time, killing Hindu priests, Shias, Ahmeddiyas, Sufis, secular
activists, atheists, bloggers, writers and professors, to name a few.
One of the killings was of a young student named Nazimuddin Samad. His
crime? Organising campaigns for secularism on Facebook.
Rising extremism
In an article published on Sabrang India less than two months ago,
Bangladesh’s feminist activist Khushi Kabir had pointed to her
country’s dangerous drift towards extremist Islam. “The message that
there is only one form, a form alien to this land, of belief and
practice, that of the Wahabi/Salafis who are not part of the four
Mazhabs of the Islamic Sunni belief is now being pushed with full
force as the current agenda," she said. "Many killed in brutal manner
have been believers, Pirs, Shias, Ahmedias, followers of the Sufi
tradition, priests from other religions, writers who were not
necessarily atheists”.
Kabir had lamented the Hasina government’s myopia over the dark clouds
gathering over Bangladesh and the state’s callous naming of the
victims as the accused: “Those feeling outraged at this [ongoing]
barbarism are asked that one should be careful not to hurt the
sentiment of the believers," she said. "Whose sentiment are we talking
about? Which believers? The misogynists, communalists who preach and
breed obscurantism, a group financially strong, having the backing of
the powers that be, misrepresenting and misquoting for their own
vested interests?”
“1971 has taught us that killing cannot stop freedom," she concluded.
"It did not then, it will not now”.
Her brave words, sadly, have not stopped the Islamists from their
murderous misdeeds.
Social activists like Kabir are not the only ones concerned over the
cancerous growth of extremism in the country’s body polity. Dhaka
Tribune reported on June 6 that over 1,00,000 ulema from Bangladesh
had issued a joint fatwa against terrorism.
Tracing the growth
The Islamic State, which has claimed “credit” for the latest mass
murder at Holey Artisan Bakery has also boasted of targeting others in
recent months. It and the Al Qaeda are currently engaged in a fierce
competition across our sub-continent aiming to outdo each other in
spreading their terror tentacles. That’s now. But the malignant growth
of Islamist extremism in Bangladesh can be easily traced back to the
Jamaat-e-Islami and its militant student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir.
The official website of the Jamaat-e-Islami continues to protest its
innocence, claiming that “Islamists are the most principled, pious,
god-fearing and kind people on the earth”. Facts on the ground tell a
different tale.
In March 2013, Amnesty International issued a press statement on the
countrywide attack on Hindus in which more than 40 temples were
vanadlised and scores of shops and homes were burnt down. Survivors
told Amnesty International that the attackers were participants in
rallies organised by the opposition Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami and
its student group Chhatra Shibir.
In April the same month, an entire galaxy of maulanas affiliated to
the Imam Ulema Somonnoy Oikyo Parishad, Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat
(Bangladesh) and other religious bodies in Bangladesh publicly
denounced the Jamaat-Shibir for their link with terrorist Islamist
organisations. “People who believe in Wahabism and Moududism (Maulana
Abul Ala Maududi was the founder of the Jamaat-e-Islami) are enemies
of Islam as they misinterpret Quran and Sunnah”, the Ahle Sunnat
(Bangladesh) secretary general Syed Muhammad Masiuddoula had thundered
at a Sunni Ulema-Mashayekh Conference on March 17.
In December 2013, the well-known human rights organisation Ain O
Salish Kendra documented 276 major incidents of attack by the
Jamaat-Shibir extremists during the year in which a total of 492
people including 15 police members were killed and around 2,200 others
were injured.
Close links
The demands of the terrorists in the latest carnage included the
release of Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh activists who were
sentenced to a 10-year jail term in January this year for their role
in a string of bomb attacks in the country in 2005. The
Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, which is now a local IS affiliate, is committed
to converting Bangladesh into an Islamic state through armed struggle.
On August 17, 2005, it had detonated some 500 bombs simultaneously
across 300 locations in 50 Bangladeshi cities.
While the origin of the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh in the late
1990s is shrouded in some mystery, the Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh has
been accused of patronising the former while it was part of the
coalition government headed by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. In
November 2005, a Bangladesh Nationalist MP, Abu Hena alleged that the
Jamaat-e-Islami was directly involved in the emergence of the
Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh. He even named two Jamaat-e-Islami
ministers in the Bangladesh Nationalist Party-led coalition who he
claimed “are doing everything for the militants”.
Hena’s expulsion from the party did not stop Bangladesh Nationalist
Party's former minister Oli Ahmed and party whip Ashraf Hossain from
speaking out and implicating the Jamaat-e-Islami in the rise of
extremism in the country.
Recall the vibrant Shahbag movement of 2013 (many at the time drew
parallels to the Arab Uprising) which started as a vehement rejection
of the International Crime Tribunal’s verdict to condemn Abdul Quader
Mollah, assistant general secretary of Jamaat-e-Islami, to life in
prison. Protesters wanted Mollah, who was convicted for killing
hundreds of people and raping a young girl, to be put to death. But
the movement soon took the form of a mass civil society awakening
which demanded an end to all religion-based politics.
Hasina, prime minister of Bangladesh since 2009, has been leader since
1981 of the Awami Party which spearheaded the country’s 1971 breakaway
from Pakistan, rejected the two-nations theory and espoused the ideal
of a secular nation and state.
Even in this dark moment it should be clear that there are millions of
Bangladeshis – from students, professors and activists to a wide
spectrum of maulanas wedded to a tolerant Islam – who are staunchly
opposed to the Wahhabis/Salafi and the Maududian “enemies of Islam”
determined to push the country towards a totalitarian Islamic state.
In 2013, the Supreme Court declared the Jamaat-e-Islami as “illegal”
and barred the party from contesting polls. In the past it had never
managed more than 4 per cent of the votes in any election in
Bangladesh.
So, to return to where this article began, before the terrorists claim
their next victim(s), Hasina would do well to ask herself: What kind
of a Prime Minister am I? What does my Islam demand of me?
This article first appeared on Sabrang India.
No comments:
Post a Comment